Secure in your home? Don’t count on it!
1:10 pm in Uncategorized by Nigel Long
In August the Prime Minister said that tenants should no longer have a tenancy for life. He said that tenancies perhaps should be limited to a “5 or 10 year period.”
TPAS does not believe that there is any evidence that reducing the right of new tenants to reside in a social housing property will address the challenge of workless households or increase the mobility of social housing tenants.
It’s useful to remind ourselves what Professor Hills said about security of tenure in the report ‘Ends and Means: The future roles of social housing in England’ :
“A threat to the security of tenure of existing tenants who have taken it for granted would be controversial, to say the least. It would also have some side-effects which could reinforce some of the key problems described are:
- The threat that a tenancy might end, or rent increase, if someone’s circumstances improved would be an unhelpful disincentive to moves towards economic independence (or at least to what was reported at the time of each review).
- If tenants who become better-off lose their right to a tenancy and have to move, the system could institutionalise polarisation.
- If the level of rental income depends on their tenants’ future incomes, landlords’ future finances become correspondingly uncertain, making it harder for them to borrow.
Unless parallel pressures were put on owner-occupiers who “under-occupy” property (such as through more steeply graduated council tax between bands or other charges that made occupying larger property more expensive), it would seem strange in equity terms to be concentrating on the relatively small number of social tenants with larger amounts of space, particularly as it is the owners who have benefited from the increases in value that housing market pressures have created.”
According to Inside Housing on the 24th September, the Government is considering a compromise on security of tenure. They may allow different Local Authorities to offer different levels of security of tenure. So one council could offer secure tenancies the one next door could do something different.
- TPAS is seeking the views of tenants and housing staff on security of tenure. Do you support security of tenure or do you think that there is a better approach?
- Should all tenancies for tenants, housing association, council or private sector tenancies be the same?
Nigel Long
TPAS Head of Policy.


